Acceptance of Mills theory of the spacetime expansion due to matter to energy conversion
As given in Chps. 5 and 32 of Mills GUT [1], the recycling of matter and energy in the universe occurs in an oscillatory cycle wherein matter converts to energy primarily by hydrogen atom decay via a hydrino pathway, and energy to matter conversion occurs by hydrogen atom production during gamma ray bursts. The matter-energy cycle drives a dependent space-time expansion contraction cycle. The decaying dark matter signatures of power and 511 keV gamma, neutral pion, and neutron capture emission match those of hydrogen atom decay from the high-p-state hydrino inventory comprising the dark matter. The characteristics, composition, and high energetics of cosmic rays in the absence of neutrino emission overturn long-held theory but match the signatures of H atom production. The rates of production and annihilation of matter and energy match those required to the complete the cycle over the period of oscillation of the universe. The H(1/p) annihilation reaction dominates over the H matter production reaction during the expansion phase wherein the power and temperature of the universe at the beginning of the expansion is at a maximum. Conversely, the H matter production reaction dominates over the H(1/p) annihilation reaction the during the contraction phase wherein the power and temperature of the universe at the beginning of the contraction are at a minimum.
Specifically, the Schwarzschild Metric is derived by applying Maxwell’s Equations to electromagnetic and gravitational fields at particle production where in these physical laws require that as matter converts into energy according to E=mc2, spacetime expands according to c3/(4PiG) wherein G is the Newtonian gravitational constant. This modifies General Relativity to include the conservation of spacetime and gives the origin of gravity, the families and masses of fundamental particles, the acceleration of the expansion of the universe predicted by Dr. Mills in 1995 [2] and since confirmed experimentally and overturns the Big Bang model of the origin of the universe, recently confirmed by the Webb telescope.
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration recently published a paper [3] wherein the authors from 46 universities and national laboratories reported Mills mechanism of spacetime expansion. Specifically, the seminal idea of the paper entitled Positive Neutrino Masses with DESI DR2 via Matter Conversion to Dark Energy published in Phys. Rev. Lett is “to search for evidence of matter conversion to dark energy (DE)” wherein so-called dark energy is the agent 0f spacetime expansion. Actually, dark energy is just energy. Another issue with the paper is the erroneous consideration that the mass converting to energy to cause space-time expansion is neutrino mass.
The exact solutions of neutrinos are given in Mills GUT Chp 39 [1]. Rather than being particles with non-zero rest mass, neutrinos such as the electron neutrino and the muon neutrino are spin ½ photons. Massless neutrinos travel at light speed for all observers as confirmed experimentally.
In an extraordinary violation of the Standard Model and special relativity, physicists were forced to invent theories that neutrinos were massive particles to provide a mechanism for neutrinos to change type or so-called flavor such as the conversion of an electron neutrino to a muon neutrino to reconcile the inescapable discrepancy between the Solar neutrino emission predicted by the Standard Solar Model and the observations confirmed by many neutrino detectors.
In Chp 5 [1], Mills predicts that proton decay to high energy gamma rays result in the known photoneutron production reaction (Eq. (5.119)) wherein the relative number of electron to muon neutrinos are 1/3 and 2/3 of the total, respectively. The predicted electron and muon neutrino ratios match solar neutron observations by detectors such as the Homestake Solar Neutrino Experiment, GALLEX, SAGE, Sudbury Solar Neutrino Observatory, and Kamiokande and Super-Kamiokande detectors. The results do not match the Standard Solar Model prediction of an electron neutrino intensity 3 times higher than observations with no muon neutrinos observed. The only direct evidence that fusion occurs in the Sun and stars is the solar neutrino data. However, the solar neutrino data indicate that the source of sunlight from the Sun is not only the p-p chain to form helium nuclei from protons by fusion. Rather the hydrino-decay-driven chain given by Mills Eq. (5.121):
Hydrino mediated proton decay → neutron production → neutron capture → beta decay
contributes significantly. In fact, proton-proton fusion has not been measured in the laboratory under any condition even at 13 TeV p-p collisional energy at CERN and may not occur in the Sun. The p-p chain may be initiated by protons undergoing neutron capture to form deuterium. Additionally, the neutron capture and beta decay reaction may repeat to higher atomic number elements as known in the formation of heavier nuclei than iron during supernova. The possibility that the p-p chain was not the only source of solar power was considered by Bahcall [4]. According to Bahcall, [4] the possibility of a revolutionary discovery of a new source of energy in the Sun based on a prior undiscovered process is an open question. That energy source, nearing commercialization, is the power source of the SunCell.
References
1. R. L. Mills, The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics, April 2023 Edition, ISBN 979-8-218-17988-5, Library of Congress Control Number 2023905641, https://brilliantlightpower.com/GUT/GUT-CP-2020-Ed-Web.pdf.
2. R. L. Mills, The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Quantum Mechanics, November 1995 Edition, HydroCatalysis Power Corp., Malvern, PA, Library of Congress Catalog Number 94-077780, ISBN number ISBN 0-9635171-1-2, Chp. 22.
3. S. P. Ahlen, A. Aviles, B. Cartwright, K. S. Croker, W. Elbers, D. Farrah, N. Fernandez, G. Niz, J. W. Rohlf, et al. (DESI Collaboration), “Positive neutrino masses with DESI DR2 via matter conversion to dark energy”, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 135, (21 August, 2025), pp. 081003-1 – . 081003-10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yb2k-kn7h, https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/yb2k-kn7h.
4. J. N. Bahcall, “Solving the mystery of the missing neutrinos”, The Nobel Prize, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/themes/solving-the-mystery-of-the-missing-neutrinos/
For more information see prior posts:
https://brilliantlightpower.com/confirmation-of-decaying-dark-matter/
https://brilliantlightpower.com/gutcp-review-completed-webb-shows-predicted-big-bang-bust/
https://brilliantlightpower.com/dr-booker-theory-validation/